ABOUT

Clark Hill is an international team of legal advisors focused on delivering exceptional growth for your business. With locations spanning across the United States, Ireland, and Mexico, we work in agile, collaborative teams, partnering with our clients to help them reach and exceed their business goals. For more information, please visit clarkhill.com

 

 

 

 

Login

 

CONTACT

Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com

 

Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.

 

 

 

 

« Consumers Filing Saginaw Lawsuits | Main | GORDIE HOWE BRIDGE MOVES ONE STEP CLOSER »
Wednesday
Nov082017

ITC Moving North Along Macomb Orchard Trail

ITC seeking more new vegetation management easements in Washington Township.

I am currently representing 25 property owners in the Breckenridge Subdivision, houses on Yorkshire and Berkshire in Washington Township. These houses back to the Macomb Orchard Trail. I previously represented owners further south on the Trail. 

ITC is now sending a right of way acquisition company, NSI, to make offers to property owners to the north of the Breckenridge Subdivision along the Trail. There is absolutely no reason for property owners to deal with NSI. For example, in the Breckenridge Subdivision, NSI asked owners (who often referred to the tactics as involving high pressure) into to sign easements for payments of around $1,000. When ITC had the properties appraised, ITC’s offers were up to $29,000 with about half over $20,000 and most of the rest over $10,000. Some were as low as $500 dollars if the easement barely ticked the properties but virtually everyone was offered many times what NSI had offered. We are now seeking more money above those offers. 

Right of way agents like NSI try to pick the low hanging fruit. But it is ITC’s appraisal and not an offer from NSI that is the starting point for negotiations. 

There is absolutely no reason to communicate or negotiate with NSI. Property owners should await receipt of a good faith offer and are best served by hiring counsel at this point in the process. 

This post describes general issues that property owners should review when addressing an ITC taking.

If you have been contacted by NSI, ITC, or are otherwise dealing with a condemnation issue, please feel free to contact me.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>