Clark Hill PLC is an entrepreneurial full-service law firm serving clients in all areas of  real estate, business legal services, litigation, and personal legal services. For more information on Clark Hill's practice areas, professionals, and office locations, please visit clarkhill.com








Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com


Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.





« US Supreme Court Allows Greater Access to Federal Courts for Taking Cases | Main | ANN ARBOR CITY COUNCIL REJECTS REZONING REQUEST »


In order to avoid a challenge to necessity, ITC agreed to including clarifications to its easement form in the court order awarding title and possession of it.

In a condemnation case, a property owner enjoys the right to challenge whether the property rights being acquired are beyond that which is necessary to implement the project. This blog post describes the legal standards relating to such a challenge.

I am representing a number of property owners in Ann Arbor and Pittsfield Township who are contesting the just compensation owed as a result of ITC acquiring property rights to install a new transmission line. However, before moving to the just compensation phase, I engaged in extensive negotiations with ITC resulting in the entry of a court order that clarifies the easement to address a number of concerns raised by the property owners.

In each of the cases in which I represent the fee owner of the property, a Stipulated Order Waiving Necessity, Confirming Title, Transferring Possession, Ordering Payment of Just Compensation, and for Other Relief was entered by the Court. It will be recorded with the Register of Deeds. The easement sought by ITC is an attachment to it, with the body of the order containing various “clarifications” of that easement.

Specifically, the parties clarified that (1) an additional electric transmission line could not be constructed; (2) poles, towers, guy wires, anchors, or other Facilities that would impede parking or access to buildings cannot be constructed within any paved areas except in the case of temporary poles during an emergency; (3) ITC cannot enter any of the property owners’ buildings; (4) access entrances either to the properties themselves or the buildings on the properties cannot be blocked; and (5) and any damage to parking lots shall be repaired by ITC. Additional provisions relating to the initial construction were also included.

ITC was presumably motivated to reach these agreements for two reasons. First, when an agency engages in a partial taking such as an easement acquisition, just compensation must be evaluated assuming that the newly acquired rights will be used to the fullest extent of the law. This article discusses the application of this concept in different scenarios. My raising the issue alerted ITC that if they refused to address these issues, just compensation claims would be forthcoming. Additionally, ITC was able to avoid a necessity challenge that could have impacted the construction schedule. 

My clients benefitted significantly from this agreement. My clients preferred avoiding future problems on their multi-million dollar properties above making just compensation claims.

Please contact me if you are confronted with any just compensation or other taking issues.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>