Clark Hill PLC is an entrepreneurial full-service law firm serving clients in all areas of  real estate, business legal services, litigation, and personal legal services. For more information on Clark Hill's practice areas, professionals, and office locations, please visit clarkhill.com








Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com

Website: Clark Hill Property Owner Condemnation Services


Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.







During the course of constructing its new pipeline, ET Rover suffered two spills releasing 2 million gallons of drilling fluid into wetlands in Ohio.

The landscape of America is crisscrossed by millions of linear feet of pipelines transporting natural gas, crude oil, other petroleum products, etc.  Many of these pipelines are aging, creating concerns about the potential for failure.  For example, this blog post discusses the Enbridge Line 5 Pipeline that crosses the Straights of Mackinaw.  This has resulted  in greater opposition to construction of new pipelines.  For example, this post links to an article discussing Native American groups opposition to pipelines.

In my mind, one of the justifications for constructing new pipelines was the ability to decommission older pipelines.  This was based upon the presumption that a newly constructed pipeline will be less prone to failure than an older, existing pipeline.  This logic has been called into question by recent events during the construction of Rover’s new natural gas pipeline. 

This article discusses two spills of drilling fluid, described as “a thick gel-like substance used to cut through rock during construction pipeline,” in Richland County, Ohio. 

If pipeline companies can be so sloppy in their construction practices to have problems not once, but twice during the construction of its pipeline, the notion that replacing ageing pipelines through new pipeline construction will reduce problems is undercut. 

These events are pertinent to Michigan readers of this blog because Rover is installing the pipeline in Lenawee and Washtenaw Counties.  Let us hope that Rover will learn from these incidents and be able to construct its pipeline without further incident.

I have recently been involved in representing property owners with pipelines being constructed by Wolverine Pipe Line Company,  ET Rover Pipeline, Nexus Pipeline, and a small by-pass built by DTE.  Consumers Power is in the stages of planning a new pipeline project. This blog post describes general issues facing property owners relating to pipeline acquisitions.

If you are facing issues with pipeline construction, please feel free to contact me.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>