ABOUT

Clark Hill is an international team of legal advisors focused on delivering exceptional growth for your business. With locations spanning across the United States, Ireland, and Mexico, we work in agile, collaborative teams, partnering with our clients to help them reach and exceed their business goals. For more information, please visit clarkhill.com

 

 

 

 

Login

 

CONTACT

Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com

 

Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.

 

 

 

 

« ITC’S NEW SPIN ON OLD SALAMI TACTICS | Main | ITC Seeking Vegetation Management Easements in Ypsilanti Township »
Monday
Jun012015

Wolverine Pipeline Seeks a Second Line in Pittsfield Township

Wolverine Pipeline Company seeks to add a second line along an existing easement. 

This article describes Wolverine Pipeline’s intention to add a second line next to an existing line.  Wolverine may have the right to do this based upon the original easement that it acquired.  Frequently, pipelines include language allowing construction of additional pipelines in easements.  To add the second line, Wolverine will need to acquire additional rights to clear vegetation.

This situation touches on several past posts.

First, it demonstrates why it is important to understand all of the rights being acquired and value the acquisition assuming that all rights would be used to the fullest extent allowed by law.  At the time of the initial pipeline construction, it might have seemed speculative that a second line would actually be added.  However, this project shows that these rights are used in reality, which is why Michigan law requires just compensation to be evaluated based on the assumption that property rights will be used to the fullest extent allowed by law.  This article that I published in an international trade magazine discusses this general legal concept in this exact second-pipeline example.

Property owners must recognize their ability to challenge the acquisition of such excessive rights to prevent this type of issue arising in the future.  This post discusses the ability of owners to challenge the acquisition of excessive rights even where use of eminent domain is appropriate to construct the project.

Finally, the article includes the laughable and self-serving assertion that pipelines do not reduce property values.  Having a swath of property that cannot be landscaped certainly reduces property values.

If you are being targeted by an acquisition by Wolverine or any other pipeline company, please feel free to contact me.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>