ABOUT

Clark Hill is an international team of legal advisors focused on delivering exceptional growth for your business. With locations spanning across the United States, Ireland, and Mexico, we work in agile, collaborative teams, partnering with our clients to help them reach and exceed their business goals. For more information, please visit clarkhill.com

 

 

 

 

Login

 

CONTACT

Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com

 

Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.

 

 

 

 

« BEWARE OF THE SECRET USE OF HERBICIDES IN UTILITY CORRIDORS | Main | TRIAL COURT EXCLUDES EVIDENCE THAT ITC WOULD NOT USE ACQUIRED RIGHTS TO FULLEST EXTENT ALLOWED BY LAW »
Friday
Mar142014

United States Supreme Court Addresses Abandonment of Railroad Easements

Underlying fee property owners and not the United States are entitled to the fee simple interest in an abandoned railroad easement.

As an eminent domain specialist, I also follow legal developments relating to easements.  I also frequently address title issues.  Sometimes, owners take advantage of the filing of an eminent domain case that necessarily names all interested parties in a property to file cross-claims that both quiet title defects and establish the owner’s entitlement to unallocated just compensation proceeds.  Therefore, issues relating to title are related to my condemnation practice.

The United States Supreme Court recently issued an Opinion discussing the ramifications of abandonment of easements.  Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust, et al. v. United States, which contains an interesting discussion of the history of railroad development in the western United States, held that the rights to an abandoned railway easement reverted to the fee simple property owner.  In doing so, the Supreme Court reiterated that under general common law rules easements may be unilaterally terminated by abandonment, leaving the underlying fee title holder within an unencumbered interest in the property.  Since railroad abandonment occurs through a specific statutory procedure that was followed in this matter, the case does not discuss the elements necessary to establish abandonment.  The case focuses upon the interests that Congress intended the United States to retain when it authorized railroads to obtain easements pursuant to a specific statute in effect from 1875 until 1976.  Therefore, while the ruling may be narrowly applicable to one particular statute involving railroads, the holding may be informative about a wider variety of abandoned right of way corridors.  A link to the full text of the case can be found here.

If you have any questions about easement or title issues, whether they relate to an eminent domain matter or not, please do not hesitate to contact me.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>